- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 注册时间
- 2008-2-29
- 积分
- 2421
- 能量
-
- 阅读权限
- 40
- 精华
|
Meteo data comparaison
本文列举了市场上的主流气象数据软件及数据源(),比较分析了气象数据源的差异及优先应用地区,对于光伏系统设计仿真,发电量的预测具有很好的实际指导意义,供各位光伏同行讨论学习。
Global comparison between all sources: the figure shows a comparison between all available sources, for 12 locations in Europe. All values are by respect to the Meteonorm values (PVsyst internal default).
Except the first green bin, which shows the difference of Meteonorm by respect to the average of all other sources (excluding Helioclim 2005).
We can observe some trends:
We cannot say which source is the more representative of the reality (and which reality? - no one is of course able to foresee the future climate).
Meteonorm often gives lower values than the average. This means that simulations with default values in PVsyst will be rather conservative, and give prudent results for the final yield of the customer’s systems.
Except at Barcelona, very little differences between Meteonorm “old” (1961-1990) and “new” (1981-2000) data.
PVGIS seems to be one of the more compatible with Meteonorm data.
Also, when available, the WRDC data are well representative of the Meteonorm data.
Satellight data seem to overestimate the average by 5 to 10% (except in Berlin and Roma).
The Helioclim data response seems to be chaotic. Especially the 2005 values (Helioclim-2 hourly file) are very high over the other data, by a factor which is not compatible with the 2005 irradiance (see below for Geneva).
详细的内容见附件
|
|